Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite vs Realme GT Neo Flash
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite vs Realme GT Neo Flash
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (358.24 USD vs 448 USD)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 739 points)
Better display (910 points vs 750 points)
Better design (993 points vs 794 points)
Against:
Worse camera (780 points vs 937 points)
Worse battery (579 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (726 points vs 804 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4250mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 3000 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 6.43 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.48 percents vs 86.2 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (937 points vs 780 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 579 points)
Better performance (804 points vs 726 points)
Against:
Higher price (448 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Worse connectivity (739 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (750 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (794 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.43 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (86.2 percents vs 85.48 percents)