Cubot Cheetah 2 vs UMiDIGI A7s
Compare Phones: Cubot Cheetah 2 vs UMiDIGI A7s
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (140 points vs 74 points)
Better display (355 points vs 282 points)
Against:
Higher price (84.67 USD vs 76 USD)
Worse camera (407 points vs 510 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 533 points)
Worse connectivity (59 points vs 609 points)
Worse design (281 points vs 451 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 1250 megahertz)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 1 cores)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (72.62 percents vs 81.64 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (76 USD vs 84.67 USD)
Better camera (510 points vs 407 points)
Better battery (533 points vs 133 points)
Better connectivity (609 points vs 59 points)
Better design (451 points vs 281 points)
Against:
Worse performance (74 points vs 140 points)
Worse display (282 points vs 355 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1250 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 3 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (81.64 percents vs 72.62 percents)