AGM X1 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Compare Phones: AGM X1 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (299.99 USD vs 317 USD)
Better battery (895 points vs 888 points)
Against:
Worse camera (252 points vs 979 points)
Worse performance (358 points vs 701 points)
Worse connectivity (59 points vs 477 points)
Worse display (431 points vs 877 points)
Worse design (148 points vs 563 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.6)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5400mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.47 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (65.02 percents vs 88.05 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (979 points vs 252 points)
Better performance (701 points vs 358 points)
Better connectivity (477 points vs 59 points)
Better display (877 points vs 431 points)
Better design (563 points vs 148 points)
Against:
Higher price (317 USD vs 299.99 USD)
Worse battery (888 points vs 895 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5260mAh vs 5400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.47 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 65.02 percents)