AGM X1 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: AGM X1 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (895 points vs 643 points)
Against:
Higher price (299.99 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (252 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (358 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (59 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (431 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (148 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5400mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (65.02 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 299.99 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 252 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 358 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 59 points)
Better display (994 points vs 431 points)
Better design (928 points vs 148 points)
Against:
Worse battery (643 points vs 895 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 65.02 percents)