Dibea Gt200 vs Xiaomi Roborock S50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (205.8 USD vs 419.99 USD)
Less noise (652 points vs 568 points)
More compact (860 points vs 237 points)
More functions (827 points vs 771 points)
Against:
Less suction power (750 points vs 928 points)
Worse battery (533 points vs 941 points)
Worse brand (670 points vs 907 points)
Suction |
|
Against:
Smaller suction power (1200 Pascal vs 2000 Pascal)
Dimensions |
|
For:
Smaller width (300 mm vs 350 mm)
Smaller height (75 mm vs 96 mm)
Noise |
|
Battery |
|
Against:
Lower battery capacity (2600 mAh vs 5200 mAh)
Functions |
|
For:
Has remote control
Has LCD display
Against:
No virtual wall
No application control
Summary |
|
For:
More suction power (928 points vs 750 points)
Better battery (941 points vs 533 points)
Better brand (907 points vs 670 points)
Against:
Higher price (419.99 USD vs 205.8 USD)
More noise (568 points vs 652 points)
Less compact (237 points vs 860 points)
Less functions (771 points vs 827 points)
Suction |
|
For:
Bigger suction power (2000 Pascal vs 1200 Pascal)
Dimensions |
|
Against:
Bigger width (350 mm vs 300 mm)
Bigger height (96 mm vs 75 mm)
Noise |
|
Battery |
|
For:
Higher battery capacity (5200 mAh vs 2600 mAh)
Functions |
|
For:
Has virtual wall
Has application control
Against:
No remote control
No LCD display