ILIFE A4s vs Dibea Gt200
Summary |
|
For:
Better brand (759 points vs 670 points)
Against:
Higher price (208.65 USD vs 205.8 USD)
Less suction power (649 points vs 750 points)
More noise (461 points vs 652 points)
Worse battery (464 points vs 533 points)
Less compact (833 points vs 860 points)
Less functions (738 points vs 827 points)
Suction |
|
Against:
Smaller suction power (1000 Pascal vs 1200 Pascal)
Dimensions |
|
Against:
Bigger width (310 mm vs 300 mm)
Bigger height (76 mm vs 75 mm)
Noise |
|
Against:
Higher noise (65 dB vs 60 dB)
Battery |
|
Against:
Lower battery capacity (2500 mAh vs 2600 mAh)
Functions |
|
For:
Has LCD display
Against:
No application control
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (205.8 USD vs 208.65 USD)
More suction power (750 points vs 649 points)
Less noise (652 points vs 461 points)
Better battery (533 points vs 464 points)
More compact (860 points vs 833 points)
More functions (827 points vs 738 points)
Against:
Worse brand (670 points vs 759 points)
Suction |
|
For:
Bigger suction power (1200 Pascal vs 1000 Pascal)
Dimensions |
|
For:
Smaller width (300 mm vs 310 mm)
Smaller height (75 mm vs 76 mm)
Noise |
|
For:
Lower noise (60 dB vs 65 dB)
Battery |
|
For:
Higher battery capacity (2600 mAh vs 2500 mAh)
Functions |
|
For:
Has application control
Against:
No LCD display