Cubot King Kong 3 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Cubot King Kong 3 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (900 points vs 643 points)
Against:
Higher price (191.87 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (396 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (424 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (437 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (156 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (96 points vs 929 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.8 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (770 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (293 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (61.55 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 191.87 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 396 points)
Better performance (757 points vs 424 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 437 points)
Better display (994 points vs 156 points)
Better design (929 points vs 96 points)
Against:
Worse battery (643 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 770 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 293 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 61.55 percents)