Samsung Galaxy A50s vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy A50s vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (206 USD vs 224.79 USD)
Better camera (908 points vs 703 points)
Better design (858 points vs 668 points)
Against:
Worse battery (308 points vs 742 points)
Worse performance (503 points vs 728 points)
Worse connectivity (153 points vs 264 points)
Worse display (708 points vs 775 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.4 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.42 percents vs 84.78 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (742 points vs 308 points)
Better performance (728 points vs 503 points)
Better connectivity (264 points vs 153 points)
Better display (775 points vs 708 points)
Against:
Higher price (224.79 USD vs 206 USD)
Worse camera (703 points vs 908 points)
Worse design (668 points vs 858 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.4 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.78 percents vs 85.42 percents)