UMiDIGI F2 vs Nokia G20
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F2 vs Nokia G20
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 260.57 USD)
Better camera (914 points vs 619 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 857 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 247 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 517 points)
Better display (523 points vs 264 points)
Better design (600 points vs 454 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5050mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.52 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 82.08 percents)
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (260.57 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (619 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (857 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (247 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (517 points vs 956 points)
Worse display (264 points vs 523 points)
Worse design (454 points vs 600 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5050mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.08 percents vs 83.12 percents)