UMiDIGI F2 vs Nokia G10
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F2 vs Nokia G10
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (913 points vs 157 points)
Better battery (870 points vs 858 points)
Better performance (707 points vs 161 points)
Better connectivity (955 points vs 512 points)
Better display (517 points vs 264 points)
Better design (594 points vs 446 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 249.03 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5050mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.52 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 82.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (249.03 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (157 points vs 913 points)
Worse battery (858 points vs 870 points)
Worse performance (161 points vs 707 points)
Worse connectivity (512 points vs 955 points)
Worse display (264 points vs 517 points)
Worse design (446 points vs 594 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5050mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.08 percents vs 83.12 percents)