UMiDIGI Bison vs Cubot P40
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI Bison vs Cubot P40
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (816 points vs 271 points)
Better battery (773 points vs 544 points)
Better performance (671 points vs 284 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 137 points)
Better display (631 points vs 180 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 149.99 USD)
Worse design (203 points vs 371 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.2 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 271 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.28 percents vs 85.07 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (149.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Better design (371 points vs 203 points)
Against:
Worse camera (271 points vs 816 points)
Worse battery (544 points vs 773 points)
Worse performance (284 points vs 671 points)
Worse connectivity (137 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (180 points vs 631 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.2 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (271 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.07 percents vs 75.28 percents)