UMiDIGI Bison vs Cubot P40
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI Bison vs Cubot P40
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (815 points vs 271 points)
Better battery (772 points vs 544 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 282 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 136 points)
Better display (630 points vs 179 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 149.99 USD)
Worse design (202 points vs 370 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.2 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 271 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.28 percents vs 85.07 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (149.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Better design (370 points vs 202 points)
Against:
Worse camera (271 points vs 815 points)
Worse battery (544 points vs 772 points)
Worse performance (282 points vs 670 points)
Worse connectivity (136 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (179 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.2 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (271 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.07 percents vs 75.28 percents)