Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Motorola Moto G50

For:

      Lower price (339.99 USD vs 368.12 USD)

      Better battery (749 points vs 713 points)

      Better performance (757 points vs 537 points)

      Better display (996 points vs 247 points)

      Better design (967 points vs 504 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (377 points vs 693 points)

      Worse connectivity (833 points vs 897 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 60 fps)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4600mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.5 inch)

      Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 270 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 82.86 percents)

For:

      Better camera (693 points vs 377 points)

      Better connectivity (897 points vs 833 points)

Against:

      Higher price (368.12 USD vs 339.99 USD)

      Worse battery (713 points vs 749 points)

      Worse performance (537 points vs 757 points)

      Worse display (247 points vs 996 points)

      Worse design (504 points vs 967 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 24 fps)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4600mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.81 inch)

      Lower pixel density (270 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82.86 percents vs 91.65 percents)