Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (84.67 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (407 points vs 809 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 308 points)
Worse performance (140 points vs 464 points)
Worse connectivity (59 points vs 374 points)
Worse display (355 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (281 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (72.62 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 84.67 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 407 points)
Better battery (308 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 140 points)
Better connectivity (374 points vs 59 points)
Better display (630 points vs 355 points)
Better design (670 points vs 281 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 72.62 percents)