Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (84.67 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (404 points vs 807 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 304 points)
Worse performance (139 points vs 459 points)
Worse connectivity (57 points vs 368 points)
Worse display (352 points vs 628 points)
Worse design (278 points vs 667 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (72.62 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 84.67 USD)
Better camera (807 points vs 404 points)
Better battery (304 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (459 points vs 139 points)
Better connectivity (368 points vs 57 points)
Better display (628 points vs 352 points)
Better design (667 points vs 278 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 72.62 percents)