Jesy J9 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Compare Phones: Jesy J9 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (299.99 USD vs 317 USD)
Better battery (948 points vs 890 points)
Against:
Worse camera (448 points vs 978 points)
Worse performance (372 points vs 697 points)
Worse connectivity (284 points vs 472 points)
Worse display (352 points vs 875 points)
Worse design (48 points vs 558 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.6)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6150mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.47 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (58.94 percents vs 88.05 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (978 points vs 448 points)
Better performance (697 points vs 372 points)
Better connectivity (472 points vs 284 points)
Better display (875 points vs 352 points)
Better design (558 points vs 48 points)
Against:
Higher price (317 USD vs 299.99 USD)
Worse battery (890 points vs 948 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5260mAh vs 6150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.47 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 58.94 percents)