Jesy J9 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Compare Phones: Jesy J9 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (299.99 USD vs 317 USD)
Better battery (947 points vs 889 points)
Against:
Worse camera (451 points vs 979 points)
Worse performance (377 points vs 701 points)
Worse connectivity (293 points vs 479 points)
Worse display (357 points vs 877 points)
Worse design (47 points vs 564 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.6)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6150mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.47 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (58.94 percents vs 88.05 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (979 points vs 451 points)
Better performance (701 points vs 377 points)
Better connectivity (479 points vs 293 points)
Better display (877 points vs 357 points)
Better design (564 points vs 47 points)
Against:
Higher price (317 USD vs 299.99 USD)
Worse battery (889 points vs 947 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5260mAh vs 6150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.47 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 58.94 percents)