Jumper EZpad 7 vs Chuwi HiPad
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (251.9 USD vs 349.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (162 points vs 760 points)
Worse battery (767 points vs 824 points)
Worse performance (820 points vs 995 points)
Worse display (773 points vs 889 points)
Worse design (580 points vs 769 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (6500mAh vs 7000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More gpu cores (12 cores vs 4 cores)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 10 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1920 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 875 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Lower pixel density (218 pixels per inch vs 224 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (68.77 percents vs 72.14 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (760 points vs 162 points)
Better battery (824 points vs 767 points)
Better performance (995 points vs 820 points)
Better display (889 points vs 773 points)
Better design (769 points vs 580 points)
Against:
Higher price (349.99 USD vs 251.9 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (7000mAh vs 6500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (10 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1920 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (875 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)
Against:
Less gpu cores (4 cores vs 12 cores)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (224 pixels per inch vs 218 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (72.14 percents vs 68.77 percents)