Jumper EZpad 7 vs Alldocube iPlay 40
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (251.9 USD vs 274.99 USD)
Better battery (767 points vs 699 points)
Against:
Worse camera (162 points vs 855 points)
Worse performance (820 points vs 955 points)
Worse connectivity (120 points vs 970 points)
Worse display (773 points vs 872 points)
Worse design (580 points vs 937 points)
Camera |
|
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6500mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1920 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 850 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (10.1 inch vs 10.4 inch)
Lower pixel density (218 pixels per inch vs 224 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (68.77 percents vs 78.86 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (855 points vs 162 points)
Better performance (955 points vs 820 points)
Better connectivity (970 points vs 120 points)
Better display (872 points vs 773 points)
Better design (937 points vs 580 points)
Against:
Higher price (274.99 USD vs 251.9 USD)
Worse battery (699 points vs 767 points)
Camera |
|
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (6000mAh vs 6500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1920 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (850 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (10.4 inch vs 10.1 inches)
Higher pixel density (224 pixels per inch vs 218 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (78.86 percents vs 68.77 percents)