UMiDIGI F2 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F2 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (711 points vs 664 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 850 points)
Better design (600 points vs 236 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 254 USD)
Worse camera (914 points vs 924 points)
Worse display (523 points vs 776 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 36.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Against:
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 4 cores)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 76.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Better camera (924 points vs 914 points)
Better display (776 points vs 523 points)
Against:
Worse performance (664 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (850 points vs 956 points)
Worse design (236 points vs 600 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (36.11 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 3 cores)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (76.7 percents vs 83.12 percents)