Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S vs Samsung Galaxy M11
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S vs Samsung Galaxy M11
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (681 points vs 148 points)
Better battery (856 points vs 713 points)
Better performance (550 points vs 9 points)
Better display (774 points vs 191 points)
Better design (667 points vs 454 points)
Against:
Higher price (215 USD vs 199.48 USD)
Worse connectivity (263 points vs 451 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.4 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 268 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.78 percents vs 81.91 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (199.48 USD vs 215 USD)
Better connectivity (451 points vs 263 points)
Against:
Worse camera (148 points vs 681 points)
Worse battery (713 points vs 856 points)
Worse performance (9 points vs 550 points)
Worse display (191 points vs 774 points)
Worse design (454 points vs 667 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.4 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (268 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.91 percents vs 84.78 percents)