Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Nokia C20

For:

      Better camera (766 points vs 23 points)

      Better battery (900 points vs 133 points)

      Better performance (476 points vs 14 points)

      Better connectivity (516 points vs 201 points)

      Better display (688 points vs 264 points)

      Better design (447 points vs 433 points)

Against:

      Higher price (158 USD vs 143.97 USD)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3000mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)

      More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.52 inch)

      Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 77.72 percents)

For:

      Lower price (143.97 USD vs 158 USD)

Against:

      Worse camera (23 points vs 766 points)

      Worse battery (133 points vs 900 points)

      Worse performance (14 points vs 476 points)

      Worse connectivity (201 points vs 516 points)

      Worse display (264 points vs 688 points)

      Worse design (433 points vs 447 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 6000mAh)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.53 inch)

      Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (77.72 percents vs 83.7 percents)