OnePlus 9 Pro vs Motorola Moto G50

For:

      Lower price (189 USD vs 368.12 USD)

      Better camera (967 points vs 692 points)

      Better performance (756 points vs 536 points)

      Better connectivity (971 points vs 897 points)

      Better display (994 points vs 246 points)

      Better design (928 points vs 503 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (643 points vs 712 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.5 inch)

      Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 270 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 82.86 percents)

For:

      Better battery (712 points vs 643 points)

Against:

      Higher price (368.12 USD vs 189 USD)

      Worse camera (692 points vs 967 points)

      Worse performance (536 points vs 756 points)

      Worse connectivity (897 points vs 971 points)

      Worse display (246 points vs 994 points)

      Worse design (503 points vs 928 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4500mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)

      Lower pixel density (270 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82.86 percents vs 92.12 percents)